A new lawsuit was filed against Apple from five customers claiming that the smart Apple watch has a flawed design that can "lead to a risk of personal injury," according to the case document.
The lawsuit, which was filed with the US District Court in North California, claims that the area between the structure and the show does not contain enough space to endure the enlarged battery.
When the battery enlarges, this leads to pushing it against the screen that may lead to separation and breaking it, and detecting sharp edges that can be dangerous to its wearer.
All the plaintiffs tested the Apple Watch fractures, but Chris Smith was seriously injured when the Series 3 watch battery was amputated and cut off the width, shattered his arm and vein slices.
The lawsuit says: “Apple knew that the hours were defective before the time when I started selling it to the public.”
The document continues to highlight many American Apple patent patents that indicate that the battery is vulnerable to inflation, with the closest patent dating back to 2015.
All Apple Watch models, with the exception of the new watch series 7, are included in the lawsuit, along with each size and model made.
Apple boasted about the delicate design of the Apple Watch, which is only possible by filling the battery tightly inside the structure.
If the battery is inflated, it will be pushed through the screen, and it will destroy the width and the structure in the context of that.
The lawsuit says: “The swelling creates a great upward pressure on the face of the hour, which causes the screen to separate, destroy and/or crack, which exposes its sharp, thorny edges and leads to an hourly operational failure and/or personal injuries resulting from physical communication that is not intended to the separate or shattered screen orChampion. ”
The lawsuit includes pictures of a deep cut on the Smith arm, along with other plaintiffs' claims.
However, Smith is the only one who was subjected to injuries, and the rest were exposed to the separation of the width of the watch only from the body.
Others seek to obtain general, private, accidental, legal and punitive damage to the injuries caused by them from the same problem as Apple Watch.They are demanding the return of their money.
The lawsuit also requires that Apple "insufficiently reveal the defective nature of the hour" and that the laws and costs of law are paid.
When Apple Watch was first launched in 2015, many users noticed signs of "burning" and rash on their wrists, which they say are the result of wearing Apple Watch.
Apple then replied, "We are working with a great deal of care and we do many research when choosing materials for all our devices."
"A few people will face reactions to certain materials."
"This can be due to allergies, environmental factors, such as exposure to irritants such as soap or sweat, and other reasons."
The company has warned the customers that some of the clock tapes contain nickel, which could cause reactions, but it said that the amount used under the European Reach has a strict Reach.Therefore, exposure to nickel is unlikely to be a problem. ”
"Methacrillas is found in many consumer products that come into contact with the skin, such as adhesive dressings," says Apple's support page.
"Some people may be sensitive to them, or allergies may develop over time."
"Apple Watch and its tape are designed so that the parts that contain metharils are not in direct contact with your skin."
While one of the users said he believes that the sensor can lead to a high temperature on the back of his watch, which causes burns, but some people can suffer from the same problems that occur when wearing a normal hour.
Apple's support page indicates that the device may become uncomfortable if it is tightly closed or loose.
